PE M&A Activity ↑12.4%│ Industrial EBITDA Multiples 7.2×│ B2B Buyer Trust Index ↓31%│ SEO Click-Through Rate ↓44%│ LMM Deal Volume ↑8.1%│ Sales Hire Failure Rate 67%│ Organic Growth Gap 2.3× plan│ PE Dry Powder $2.59T│ PRESS: Ed Marsh at PE Operating Partners Summit│ DEAL: Midwest controls automation acquired at 7.8×│ PE M&A Activity ↑12.4%│ Industrial EBITDA Multiples 7.2×│ B2B Buyer Trust Index ↓31%│ SEO Click-Through Rate ↓44%│ LMM Deal Volume ↑8.1%│ Sales Hire Failure Rate 67%│ Organic Growth Gap 2.3× plan│ PE Dry Powder $2.59T│ PRESS: Ed Marsh at PE Operating Partners Summit│ DEAL: Midwest controls automation acquired at 7.8×│

Try inverse lead scoring to improve virtual B2B Sales

Why do B2B sales teams refuse to use the predictive capability of B2B marketing automation and other tools? Sometimes they would rather be ignorant!

 

Does your pipeline pile up at quotes?

It's the classic B2B sales problem. Some will tell you that the quotes are issued too early. They're almost always right. Others will tell you that the quotes were provided inappropriately - for instance to buyers without budget or understanding of what they're trying to fix. They're often right too.

And yet it keeps happening. And as it becomes easier for prospects to hide behind internet anonymity (see, hear & say nothing directly to you) it's happening more to sales teams that used to be above average.

That's because the personal interactions that used to be fundamental to assessing various factors of interest and buying probability have largely been replaced with digital interactions.

It's well understood that email is effective for transmitting facts - but problematic at capturing and conveying nuance. But the problem is bigger than that.

Prospect infidelity

 

Have you ever had one of those moments of B2B sales panic when you found four competitive sign-ins in a prospect's visitor log in the lobby (back in the day when sales teams made sales calls)?

 

What was your reaction? Probably some form of "They're talking to THEM??!!" Well of course they are. That's their job, right?

But you knew it - whether by asking questions artfully but directly, by sleuthing in the visitors log or even asking one of your internal contacts. And because you knew which competitors were active, you were able to address what you knew to be the implications as you went through the sales process. 

You were face to face and knew when they "looked like you needed a beer."

Today you're likely unaware.....

Prospect priorities

No matter how devious prospects may be, or you may assume they are, the reality is that they want to make the best decision they can, as quickly as they need to. They've got the same overwhelming workload and competing priorities as you, and when you assume that they are focused on your solution - just because it's the most important thing in your universe - you'll lose.

Your marketing needs to sell virtually (not eliminating direct sales, but establishing the authority to open conversations) according to various perspectives and priorities common in team buying.

But you can't just hang your content on the web and assume that it's all consumed by the right people in the right order so that they reach the only reasonable conclusion - that your product/service is the right one. Instead you must replicate the face-to-face B2B sales interactions of yesterday, to determine when they're drifting away. 

To state the obvious, there is no substitute for actual personal conversation - in person or by telephone. For many prospects that's not important. Like you, they assume that any information that's pertinent is available online - if they don't find it easily searching, it must not be relevant. Further, they have faith in their ability to analyze the options and select the best option. So it's not that they don't want to talk to you - it's that they don't think they need to. Yet the absence of direct contact frustrates most B2B sales teams.

The next best solution is to use marketing automation to understand when they're looking "like you need a beer." 


Download our free guide to the art & science of marketing automation


Read their eyes & expressions - virtually

If a prospect takes calls or reads their email as you sit with them in a meeting, you can draw some conclusions about their interest and engagement. Similarly if they stop taking calls or cancel meetings you'll know that something's changed.

You can do the same by tracking their digital engagement with you - sort of like an inverse lead score.

It's common to use marketing automation to monitor prospect behaviors (visits to specific website pages, cumulative site visits, emails opened, emails read, content downloaded, etc) to gauge engagement and trigger sales activity once certain thresholds are crossed. The assumption, naturally, is that intense & consistent activity correlates to interest.

The opposite is often true.  As formerly engaged prospects start to drift away they will open and read fewer mails; they'll visit your website less frequently; and they'll consume less of your content. Do any of those behaviors mean they're close to buying a competitor's solution? Not necessarily - any of a number of explanations could apply. However, if they're closer to another solution, those are also likely indicators.

So why not set up marketing automation scoring and workflows that notify inside or field sales of prospect "disengagement"? Provide reps with scripts and email templates that make it easy for prospects to share "what's changed" and give your team a chance to save the deal.

Prospects probably aren't choosing against your solution - they're simply gravitating toward one they understand to be better. In a world where prospects hide behind the internet and say nothing, if you can discern that evolution from their behavior you'll substantially improve your B2B sales success rate.

Give your teams the tools they need to read their prospects' faces for when it's time for an uncomfortable but necessary conversation.

Download our free guide to marketing automation to learn more.

New Call-to-action

 

Is your team selling at decision five?
A 15-minute conversation will tell you where your deals are really won or lost.
BOOK 15 MIN →
KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Most complex industrial purchases must clear five separate buying decisions.
  • Decisions 2 and 3 determine whether a purchase happens at all — and most reps don't know they exist.
  • Most big-ticket B2B industrial forecasts are fantasies because they ignore those decisions.
  • Buying teams typically include eight to twelve people.
  • Reps need business acumen — not just product knowledge — to engage decision-makers early.
Ed Marsh
Ed Marsh
Ed was going to be an architect because he loved the nexus of engineering and design. That was before was going to be an engineer; before he graduated from Johns Hopkins; before he was an Army Infantry Officer (Airborne Ranger); before he set B2B industrial sales records; before he was partners with a German capital equipment manufacturer; before he founded a distribution/rep company for industrial products in India; until he decided that managing a business and employees wasn’t what he enjoyed. Now that Ed’s got all of that out of his system he runs a consultancy that helps US manufacturing companies grow by applying process excellence to business development – completing the full circle back to an engineering & design combination. His practice is built on a unique methodology which combines powerful digital marketing methodologies (a HubSpot partner) with his extensive international biz dev experience.
STOP FORECASTING FANTASIES

Find out where your deals are really won.

Fifteen minutes with Ed Marsh. Sharp questions, honest answers, and a clear read on whether your team is selling to the right decision.

BOOK 15 MINUTES →