Industrial Marketing Built for a
Zero Trust, Zero Click World.
SEO is broken. Form-fills are dead. Trust is at all-time lows. The website-to-form-fill model that ran industrial marketing for a decade is over, and it's not coming back.
Ed brings empirical measurement and engineering rigor to industrial revenue marketing, for buyers who don't click, don't trust, and don't talk to a rep until they're 70% through their decision.
Why 2026 Is the Watershed Year for Industrial Marketing.
Each waypoint is a moment when the industrial marketing playbook quietly stopped working. Ed wrote the watershed paper in early 2025. By 2026, the predictions have consolidated, and most playbooks still haven't adjusted.
Three decades inside industrial. Now he's writing about why 2025 is the watershed year.
Ed has spent his career inside industrial manufacturing: building, selling, advising, sitting on boards, and writing about what works. He is the author of two books on industrial sales and marketing, and works exclusively with lower-middle and middle-market industrial manufacturers and their private equity sponsors to build predictable, scalable organic revenue growth.
Ed's Cycles & Secular Changes paper named the watershed before most industrial marketers admitted the ground had moved. The frameworks below (Marketing for LLMs, the new top of funnel, ABM, partner co-marketing, passively-consumable content) are the systems Ed is building in response to a marketing landscape that broke in plain sight.
How Mature Is Your Marketing Engine, Really?
There's a maturity model for industrial sales, and one for marketing too. Most companies score average across both. A coming Ed Marsh framework will name the dimensions and benchmark you against industrial peers.
There are four levels of industrial marketing maturity: laggard, average, strong, and leader. Most companies sit at average and don't know it, because they're benchmarking against their direct competitors instead of against what's actually possible. The ORE diagnostic already audits the marketing dimensions: content discipline, website conversion, SEO/AEO, competitive intelligence, sales enablement, and lead generation. The standalone Marketing Maturity Model, currently in development, will add the dimensions that matter most in the new landscape: AI citation strategy, podcast and video distribution, partner co-marketing rigor, and what Ed calls passive consumability: the fitness of your content for buyers consuming while doing something else.
What separates a 'strong' marketing function from an 'average' one is rarely budget. It's whether the basics (defined ICP, a content calendar tied to buyer questions, attribution that follows the dollar, and a marketing-sales relationship that isn't war) are actually in place and being used. Most aren't. Industrial buyers can tell.
The Four Maturity Levels
- Laggard: campaigns without strategy, gut-feel everything
- Average: tools deployed but not used; MQL theater
- Strong: disciplined ICP, attribution, content cadence
- Leader: owns industry authority, cited by AI, trusted by peers
ORE™ Diagnostic: Marketing Section
Marketing Maturity Model
Industrial RevOps and Marketing
17 Marketing Dimensions
- ICP definition · Content strategy · Website conversion
- SEO & AEO · Schema & AI citation · PR strategy
- Podcast cadence · Video distribution · Email discipline
- Marketing automation · Lead routing · Attribution
- Partner co-marketing · ABM motions · Sales enablement
Why Most Industrial Marketing Is Average
Self-Paced Diagnostic Delivers Insights to Optimize Sales & Marketing
Manufacturing Marketing and Industrial Marketing
Overall Revenue Effectiveness™
If your marketing engine isn't producing leads, the problem might not be marketing alone. ORE is the comprehensive diagnostic that audits your entire revenue engine (corporate strategy, marketing, technology, and sales) as one integrated system.
An audit of your whole revenue engine, including the marketing layer that's most exposed to AI search.
Most industrial revenue problems aren't where leadership thinks they are. Marketing gets blamed when leads decline; sales gets blamed when the number gets missed. When Ed runs the diagnostic, the actual breakdown is usually a system problem: marketing automation that doesn't talk to CRM, content that no one read, attribution that runs on a different ID system than sales, and a corporate strategy that doesn't actually map to who buys.
ORE is the audit that finds the real problem. It's a yes/no diagnostic built on the same engineering rigor you already apply to your shop floor. The default answer is "no." If you have to check with your team, that's also "no."
The default answer is "no." If you're not sure, the answer is no. If you have some of a list in place but not all, the answer is also no.
Your Next Buyer Won't Google You. They'll Ask AI.
AI Overviews now answer questions Google used to send to your website. The new game is being the source the AI cites. Different content, different schema, different distribution.
Content architecture for LLM crawling. Schema markup. Authority signals. PR for AI citations. AEO, Answer Engine Optimization, is the new SEO. The companies that understand this are quietly becoming the cited sources for their industries, and the ones that don't are watching their organic traffic disappear with no idea where it went. The shift isn't subtle: SparkToro's data shows nearly 60% of US Google searches now end with no click to the open web. ChatGPT and Perplexity answer without linking. The meta-game is no longer 'rank for the keyword'. It's 'be the answer the model gives.'
The good news is that the industrial buyer was already self-diagnosing on Google before the AI shift; AI just made the diagnosis faster and more efficient. The bad news is that the new authority signal isn't backlinks. It's whether real industry experts converge on your content as the trusted source. That's earned, not engineered. The companies winning here have a real publishing discipline, a real point of view, and real industry voices (operators, peers, customers) choosing to be associated with their work.
What's Changed
- AI Overviews replaced top-of-funnel queries
- 0.4% of searches go to paid ads
- Branded queries are 44% of search volume
- ChatGPT & Perplexity answer without linking
- Authority is now whether the model cites you
Should LLMs Make Us Rethink or Abandon SEO for Manufacturers?
Website Design for Manufacturing Companies in a Post SEO Market
AEO Fundamentals
- Schema markup that signals authoritative answers
- Question-pattern content (people-also-ask shape)
- Structured data for products, specs, FAQs
- Citations from peers, podcasts, and PR
- Content depth the model trusts to summarize
Public Relations May Fill the Google Void in Industrial Marketing
Rick Kranz on AI for Industrial Sales and Marketing
David Anderson on Tacit Knowledge & AI and Industrial Marketing
AEO Setup for Industrial Manufacturers
When Buyers Don't Trust Marketing, Marketing Has to Stop Looking Like Marketing.
The new top of funnel is podcasts, video, PR, partner endorsements, and earned authority: the channels buyers already trust. Form-fills, SEO landers, and gated content are deprecated.
Trust is at all-time lows. Buyers have a dim view of B2B sales people: 74% of recent buyers said the meeting was a waste of time and they would never take another with that salesperson; only 18% said the meeting met their expectations. The same buyers consume content peer-to-peer, through trusted podcasts, industry voices, conference replays, LinkedIn Live, partner-introduced video, and content from operators they already know. The marketing organizations that fill the funnel today are the ones with a media arm, not a campaigns arm.
Building trust requires transparency, empirical credibility, and authentic expertise demonstrated through channels buyers already consume. That means co-creating content with industry voices instead of writing about yourself. It means showing up on the podcasts your buyers listen to instead of running paid retargeting. It means PR that earns citations instead of brochures. And it means treating your customers, partners, and industry peers as the trust signals, because they are.
The New Top of Funnel
- PR & earned media: citations, not impressions
- Podcast guest appearances on trusted shows
- Video on the platforms buyers already use
- Partner co-marketing and warm intros
- Customer storytelling (their voice, not yours)
Ted McKenna on Buyer Indecision and the JOLT Effect
Industrial Public Relations and Manufacturing Marketing for Lead Gen
Trust Red Flags
- Gated everything: the form-fill tax
- Stock photos of stock photo people
- AI-generated content with no perspective
- Marketing copy that no operator would write
- Award badges that no one in your industry recognizes
Marcus Sheridan on Manufacturing Content Marketing and Trust
Kathleen Booth on Community and Trust in Sales
Alyssa Gelbard on Executive Branding for Industrial Manufacturers
Role of a Manufacturing Blog on an Industrial Manufacturing Website
Targeted Demand Activation Against Named Accounts.
The opposite of fishing for inbound. Identify the accounts you want, build the play, run it across marketing AND sales as one motion. ABM is the natural shape of demand activation when your TAM is 500 accounts.
ABM works when marketing and sales operate as one team against a defined target list, not when marketing pushes leads and sales ignores them. For industrial, where the addressable market is often smaller than 500 accounts and the buying teams are 8–12 people deep, ABM is the natural shape of demand activation. The IP for this isn't new: target account selling, named-account marketing, key account programs: these were the original B2B playbook before inbound briefly convinced everyone that demand should be measured in form-fills.
The mechanic that matters is coordination: the right contacts, the right people, at the right companies, at the right time. The marketing function identifies accounts and orchestrates the touches; sales runs the relationship work and the buying-committee mapping. The two functions share a target list, share a definition of progress, and share accountability for revenue. When this works, it looks unfair. Competitors describe it as 'they keep showing up everywhere.'
ABM Fundamentals
- Tiered account list (T1, T2, T3 with different play depth)
- Buying-committee mapping at every account
- Coordinated marketing + sales touches per quarter
- Account-level engagement scoring (not lead-level)
- Marketing & sales sharing one target list
Jon Russo on Account Based Marketing for Manufacturers
Does Account-Based Marketing Work for Industrial Manufacturers?
ABM Red Flags
- Target list that includes everyone in HubSpot
- Marketing 'ABM' that's just retargeting ads
- Sales not bought into the target list
- No buying-committee mapping
- Engagement measured at lead level, not account level
An Ideal Customer Profile Drives Manufacturing Marketing Improvements
Salim Awad on LinkedIn Lead Generation for Industrial Manufacturers
3 Reasons Why a Brandscape Should be Part of Your Industrial Marketing
Jim Kraus on Creating Killer Buyer Personas for B2B Industrials
A Deep Dive into Cycles & Secular Changes in Industrial Sales & Marketing
Ed's January 2025 essay that named the watershed before most industrial marketers admitted the ground had moved. The data has only consolidated since.
A Deep Dive into Cycles & Secular Changes in Industrial Sales & Marketing
The argument, in five movements
- Executive Summary: where the symptoms show up first
- Understanding Cycles vs. Secular Changes
- 1895–2005: The Creation of Professional Sales & Marketing
- The Current Reality: By the Numbers
- The Death of Traditional Digital Marketing
"Google has become a place people go after they discover a need rather than a demand-creation or even demand-nudging platform."
SparkToro · Quoted in the paperMost Industrial Revenue Flows Through Partners. Most Marketing Doesn't Reflect That.
Reps, distributors, integrators, OEMs, channel resellers. Joint demand creation through partners is the highest-leverage motion most industrial marketing teams aren't running.
Industrial revenue is rarely direct. It flows through manufacturers' reps, distributors, system integrators, OEM partners, and channel resellers. The companies that grow fastest treat their partner ecosystem with the same rigor they apply to their direct sales team: defined ICPs for partners, structured onboarding, co-selling motions, joint marketing programs, and accountability for partner-attributed revenue. From the marketing side, this means co-branded content, co-hosted events, joint case studies, MDF programs that actually generate measurable activity, and a content calendar that includes the partner's market, not just yours.
Partner marketing is a force multiplier when done well. It's a money pit when done badly. The difference is whether there's a strategy. Most industrial companies do the opposite: they sign anyone who shows up with a business card, send them a price list, hand over MDF with no accountability, and hope. The partners who deserve marketing investment are the ones with their own demand-generation motion who can be force-multiplied, not the ones who need to be replaced.
Co-Marketing Motions That Work
- Co-branded content with partner authorship
- Joint case studies with measurable outcomes
- Co-hosted webinars, podcasts, in-person events
- MDF programs tied to lead-generation outcomes
- Partner-distributed content (their list + yours)
Samantha Gadenne on Making Industrial Partnership Marketing Work
Partnership Marketing and a Nearbound Lead Generation & Sales Strategy
Partner Marketing Red Flags
- MDF spent without ROI tracking
- No partner ICP: anyone can sign
- Co-marketing that's just sharing logos
- No defined motion across the partner journey
- Partner-attributed revenue not measured
Vaughn Mordecai on Industrial Channel Sales, PRM & Partner Ecosystems
Franz Schrepf on Partnership Ecosystems and Channel Sales
How to Build a Partnership Ecosystem to Drive Capital Equipment Sales
Jean Rabatin on Women in Sales & Complex Channel Management
CRM, Marketing Automation, AI, and the Mess in Between.
Most industrial companies have technology that doesn't talk to itself. The right stack is invisible. The wrong stack creates work that nobody does, and reports that nobody believes.
The industrial revenue tech stack has four layers: CRM (the source of truth for accounts and deals), marketing automation (the engine for nurture and lead routing), sales acceleration (the tools reps actually use day-to-day), and an analytics/AI layer that turns the data from the other three into insight. From the marketing side, the failure mode is almost always the same: marketing automation deployed without integration, attribution running on a different ID system than CRM, AI tools generating content nobody reads, and a Frankenstein stack of point solutions that nobody fully owns.
The right stack is invisible to the marketer. Content goes out, engagement is captured, the right account-level signal reaches sales without a manual handoff, and reporting reflects what actually happened. Getting there isn't a tooling decision. It's a process decision first, an integration decision second, and a tooling decision third. Most companies try to do it in the reverse order and end up with a $200K/year stack that nobody uses.
Core Stack Layers
- CRM: accounts, deals, contacts, activity
- Marketing automation: nurture, routing, attribution
- Sales acceleration: sequences, calling, content
- Analytics & AI: insight layer over the data
- Schema/AEO: the new authority infrastructure
Adam Honig on Creating Success with Manufacturing CRM
Four Custom CRM Objects Every Industrial Manufacturer Should Create
Stack Red Flags
- Reports nobody opens
- CRM nobody updates
- Marketing data sales doesn't trust
- Automation nobody configured
- AI tools generating slop nobody reads
Capital Equipment Sales Pipelines and an Important CRM vs ERP Decision
HubSpot Solutions Partner
AI in Industrial Sales & Marketing: Hype vs. Useful
Tech Stack Assessment
Walking-the-Dog Content. Commute Content. Shop-Floor Content.
Buyers don't sit down to read whitepapers. They listen on the commute, watch on lunch break, scroll on the shop floor. The content discipline that wins is the one your buyer can consume without setting aside time.
Audio and video are the dominant industrial content formats now, not because every buyer prefers them, but because they're the formats buyers can consume in the spare moments they actually have. Ed runs the Industrial Growth Institute Podcast for exactly this reason: it's the format that gets in front of operators, executives, and PE partners during the windshield time, the gym time, and the dog-walk time. That's where industrial content gets consumed today, not at a desk, with a coffee, opening a 24-page whitepaper.
The marketing teams winning the trust battle are the ones producing audio and video on a sustained cadence, not the ones running monthly campaigns. The bar isn't production polish; it's authenticity, frequency, and the ability to keep doing it for 18 months before it starts compounding. The companies that quit at month six are the same companies wondering why their content marketing 'didn't work.'
Passive Formats That Work
- Long-form podcast (45–75 minutes, conversational)
- Short-form video (60–180 seconds, demonstrative)
- Long-form video (10–25 min, explainer or interview)
- Audiograms & video clips (cross-platform distribution)
- Newsletter (the connective tissue across formats)
Ed Marsh Launches the Industrial Growth Institute Podcast
Should Your Inbound Marketing Content Include a Podcast?
Why Most Industrial Podcasts Fail
- Six episodes, then nothing for a year
- Host has no point of view
- Guests are only customers (no industry depth)
- No distribution motion behind the show
- Production polish over consistency
Dan Allford and Johnny Tyler on YouTube for Industrial Marketing
Chris Fox Video, Content and Marketing for Manufacturers
Lew Weiss On Manufacturing Talk Radio and Industrial Podcast Marketing
Steve Maurer on Emotion, Authenticity and Industrial Digital Marketing
Talk to Ed About Your Sales Team
Sharp diagnostic questions. An honest read on whether Ed can help, and if he can't, who can.
An honest read on your sales team.
No pitch deck. No proposal cycle. No follow-up automation. Ed asks sharp diagnostic questions about your organic growth challenge and gives you an honest read on what's actually happening.
- A clear next step, a better referral, or a few things you can do this week
- Ed's read on whether your sales problem is people, process, or strategy
- If Ed isn't the right fit, he'll tell you who is
✉
Prefer to leave Ed a message instead?
No calendar, no obligation. Ed reads every message personally.
▼
Ed reads every message personally and usually responds within 24 hours.